Comments on Secular Planet: IDiocy

reaPlease reread this article of yours again. A l...

2011-12-15T16:24:50.448-05:00

reaPlease reread this article of yours again. A lot of your retaliatory comments on the letters are actually rather blatantly incorrect and stupidly ignorant of the points made in what you're criticizing. Why did you pen this? Is this a form of self-assurance for your elected religious beliefs? Is this how you've chosen to spend your life, hating and criticizing the proponents of what is your past? Is there anything wrong with coexisting peacefully with those who now believe differently from you? You are not going to change anyone's mind by writing such a piece; you have actually rendered my own beliefs on the subject even stronger. Now. Should I thank you for that?

In the 2005 Dover, PA case, it was proven, because...

2009-03-16T02:06:00.000-04:00

In the 2005 Dover, PA case, it was proven, because of poor editing, that the "intelligent design" supporters had copied text directly from a "creationists" publication ---so that silly argument that intelligent design and creationism was shot down in court.

In his ruling, Judge Jones (a George W. Bush appointee, no less) stated: “It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy.”

My post about the Dover case includes links to more information about it:
http://tirelesswing.blogspot.com/2009/02/christians-behaving-badly-3.html